The more disposable income at the end will lead to a better return on fund investors, enhance shareholder value due to greater demand . There are two approaches together in reference to the capital structure , which normally affects the value of the company by the overall cost of capital (K ) is an approach called relevance approach theories of capital structure and others have no influence on the value of the company is known as an approach to insignificance. The debt financing in the capital structure facilitates the company to increase the value of EPS on one side on the other hand, it is subject to the leverage in reference to trading on equity . The use of debt in the capital structure increases the value of the company by the cost of capital.
NET APPROACH
Mathematically, the relationship between the cost of capital, overall cost of capital and debt ratio is explained as follows :Ke = Ko + ( Ko- Ki ) B / S
Net income approach was developed by Durand, in which he portrayed the influence of leverage on the value of the company , which means that the value of the company is subject to the application debt or leverage. In this approach, the cost of debt is identified as a source of cheaper than equity capital financing. The application of more debt in the capital structure lowers the overall capital , especially under 100% debt financing leads to resemble the over all cost of capital than the cost of debt. The weighted average cost of capital will result in an application more leverage in the capital structure , only by reference to cost to raise the cost of equity capital .
Ko Ke = (S / V) + Ki (B / V)
The enterprise value is more in the case of overall lower cost of capital through an application more leverage in the capital structure . The optimal capital structure is that when the value of the company is higher and the overall cost of capital is lower.
V = B + S
V = EBIT / Ko
This approach emphasizes that the application of lever affects the overall cost of capital and affects the value of the company .
NET OPERATING INCOME APPROACH
This alternative approach developed by Durand , who assumed that the application of lever have no influence on the value of the company by the overall cost of the underlying capital. Applying more leverage leads to lower explicit cost of capital on the one hand and on the other side of implied cost of debt is expected to rise . How the implicit cost of debt will increase ? The application of more debt leads to increased financial risk among investors , which justified the holders of the capital to bear an additional financial risk of the company. Due to the additional financial risk, shareholders require the company to pay additional dividends in relation to the existing. The rising expectations of shareholders dividends increased reference to the cost of equity . Under this approach , no capital structure is found to be an optimal capital structure . The main reason is that the debt ratio does not influence the overall cost of capital , which is still nothing but remains constant. He finally concluded that this approach shows that the application of lever never made an attempt to increase the value of the company , in other words is known as affected by the application of leverage.MODIGLIANI - MILLER APPROACH [M -M ]
This is the approach , attempts to explain the application of leverage does not affect the value of the business model through the behavior of investors. The model of investor behavior is taken into account to explain the value of the company is not affected by the application of the debt / leverage in the capital structure through the arbitration process . The MM approach has three different proposals :( I) The overall capital structure of the company is not affected by the cost of capital leverage
( Ii ) The cost of capital increases and offset the increase in debt in the capital structure
( Iii ) The rate cut for investment purposes is completely independent .
For discussion , the proposal is considered to study the use of leverage in the capital structure , which had no impact on the value of the company.
0 comments:
Post a Comment